Rob Foehl
2018-11-01 06:01:07 UTC
Prompted (pun intended) by the recent thread on detecting missing newlines
in command output, I'd had another look at my own version, and discovered
a potential issue with control characters being written as-is in declare
output. Minimal (harmless) reproducer:
╶➤ x () { echo $'\e[31m'"oops"$'\e[0m'; }
╶➤ declare -f x
x ()
{
echo ''"oops"''
}
Emits the string in red in a terminal. Any instances with control
sequences that do anything more invasive with the terminal cause more
trouble.
Similarly:
╶➤ y=$'\e[31m'"oops"$'\e[0m'
╶➤ declare -p y
declare -- y="oops"
String again in red. Compare with:
╶➤ set |grep ^y=
y=$'\E[31moops\E[0m'
No issues with the set output. As they can both be usefully re-read by
the shell, is there any possibility for similarly escaped output from the
declare builtin, instead of raw control characters?
-Rob
in command output, I'd had another look at my own version, and discovered
a potential issue with control characters being written as-is in declare
output. Minimal (harmless) reproducer:
╶➤ x () { echo $'\e[31m'"oops"$'\e[0m'; }
╶➤ declare -f x
x ()
{
echo ''"oops"''
}
Emits the string in red in a terminal. Any instances with control
sequences that do anything more invasive with the terminal cause more
trouble.
Similarly:
╶➤ y=$'\e[31m'"oops"$'\e[0m'
╶➤ declare -p y
declare -- y="oops"
String again in red. Compare with:
╶➤ set |grep ^y=
y=$'\E[31moops\E[0m'
No issues with the set output. As they can both be usefully re-read by
the shell, is there any possibility for similarly escaped output from the
declare builtin, instead of raw control characters?
-Rob